FundingPips7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
VS
FunderPro5.7/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
Checked 3 Nov 2026

FundingPips vs FunderPro

2-Step 100K vs Classic 2-Phase 100K

10 rules compared
3FundingPips better
4Ties
3FunderPro better

FunderPro gets you funded for $113 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are forex firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
FundingPipsFunderPro
Cost to get funded
$652
$539
FunderPro $113 less
Evaluation price
$652one-time
$539one-time
FunderPro $113 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
8% then 5%
10% then 5%
Different formats
Maximum loss
$10,000 (10%)Static
$10,000 (10%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
3 per phase
4 per phase
FundingPips fewer days
Profit split
60–100% by payout cycle
80%
Tie
Restricted countries
3
19
FundingPips fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
7.2
5.7
FundingPips rated higher
Daily loss limit
5% (of higher of balance or equity)
5% ($5,000), balance-based
Tie
Consistency rule
35% score for on-demand and monthly
None
FunderPro is less restrictive
Payouts
Weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%
Every 14 days; aims to process within 1 working day of approval
FundingPips pays out faster
Platforms
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
Tie

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose FundingPips if…
7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
  • You prefer a static floor that doesn’t trail your profits.
  • You trade on Match-Trader.
Choose FunderPro if…
5.7/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
  • You want the cheaper way in ($539 vs $652).
  • You trade on TradeLocker.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads