FundingPips7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
VS
FundedNext7.2/10 4.5 (82K)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

FundingPips vs FundedNext

2-Step 100K vs Stellar 2-Step 100K

10 rules compared
2FundingPips better
5Ties
3FundedNext better

FundedNext gets you funded for $102.01 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are forex firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
FundingPipsFundedNext
Cost to get funded
$652
$549.99
FundedNext $102.01 less
Evaluation price
$652one-time
$549.99one-time
FundedNext $102.01 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
8% then 5%
8% then 5%
Different formats
Maximum loss
$10,000 (10%)Static
$10,000 (10%)Static
Tie
Minimum trading days
3 per phase
5 per phase
FundingPips fewer days
Profit split
60–100% by payout cycle
80%, up to 95%
Tie
Restricted countries
3
20
FundingPips fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
7.2
7.2
Tie
Daily loss limit
5% (of higher of balance or equity)
5%
Tie
Consistency rule
35% score for on-demand and monthly
None stated
FundedNext is less restrictive
Payouts
Weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%
First after 21 days, then every 14 days
FundingPips pays out faster
Platforms
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
FundedNext supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose FundingPips if…
7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
  • Its payout terms suit you: weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%.
Choose FundedNext if…
7.2/10 4.5 (82K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($549.99 vs $652).
  • You trade on MT4.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads