FundingPips7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
VS
For Traders5.9/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
Checked 3 Nov 2026

FundingPips vs For Traders

2-Step 100K vs Classic 2-Step 100K

10 rules compared
3FundingPips better
4Ties
3For Traders better

For Traders gets you funded for $53 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are forex firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
FundingPipsFor Traders
Cost to get funded
$652
$599
For Traders $53 less
Evaluation price
$652one-time
$599one-time
For Traders $53 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
8% then 5%
8% then 5%
Different formats
Maximum loss
$10,000 (10%)Static
$8,000 (8%)Static
FundingPips more room
Minimum trading days
3 per phase
3
Tie
Profit split
60–100% by payout cycle
80%
Tie
Restricted countries
3
13
FundingPips fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
7.2
5.9
FundingPips rated higher
Daily loss limit
5% (of higher of balance or equity)
4% ($4,000)
Tie
Consistency rule
35% score for on-demand and monthly
None
For Traders is less restrictive
Payouts
Weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%
Every 14 days; 48-hour review; up to $15,000 per cycle
FundingPips pays out faster
Platforms
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
Tie

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose FundingPips if…
7.2/10 4.5 (70K)
  • You trade on Match-Trader.
Choose For Traders if…
5.9/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
  • You want the cheaper way in ($599 vs $652).
  • You trade on TradeLocker.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads