Funding Traders5.4/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
VS
For Traders5.9/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Funding Traders vs For Traders

2-Step PRO10 100K vs Classic 2-Step 100K

10 rules compared
2Funding Traders better
4Ties
4For Traders better

For Traders gets you funded for $151 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are forex firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Funding TradersFor Traders
Cost to get funded
$750
$599
For Traders $151 less
Evaluation price
$750one-time
$599one-time
For Traders $151 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
10% then 5%
8% then 5%
Different formats
Maximum loss
$10,000 (10%)Static
$8,000 (8%)Static
Funding Traders more room
Minimum trading days
4
3
For Traders fewer days
Profit split
80% (90% or 100% as paid add-ons)
80%
Tie
Restricted countries
5
13
Funding Traders fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
5.4
5.9
For Traders rated higher
Daily loss limit
5% of the day’s starting balance
4% ($4,000)
Tie
Consistency rule
None
None
Tie
Payouts
First 21 days after your first funded trade, then every 21 days; fee refunded with first payout
Every 14 days; 48-hour review; up to $15,000 per cycle
For Traders pays out faster
Platforms
MT5, TradeLocker
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
For Traders supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Funding Traders if…
5.4/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
  • Its payout terms suit you: first 21 days after your first funded trade, then every 21 days.
Choose For Traders if…
5.9/10⚠ Trustpilot warning
  • You want the cheaper way in ($599 vs $750).
  • You trade on cTrader.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads