Top One Futures7.7/10 4.8 (5.2K)
VSFunded Futures Network6.6/10 3.8 (514)
Checked 3 Nov 2026
Top One Futures vs Funded Futures Network
Elite Daily 50K vs MAX Standard 50K
10 rules compared
3Top One Futures better
4Ties
3Funded Futures Network better
Funded Futures Network gets you funded for $40 less.
Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.
Head to head
Top One FuturesFunded Futures Network
Cost to get funded
$218
$178
Evaluation price
$218 monthly
$178 one-time
Activation fee
None
None
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Minimum trading days
1
5
Profit split
90%
80% sim funded · 90% live
Restricted countries
72
23
Our rating (out of 10)
7.7
6.6
Daily loss limit
$1,000 on Standard (No DLL option)
None
Consistency rule
40% in the evaluation
Best day ≤ 40% of profit in early funded payouts
Payouts
Processed in under 24 hours through Rise; $500 minimum
Same day if requested in the payout window
Platforms
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Rithmic
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower
Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.
Choose Top One Futures if…
- You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
- You trade on Rithmic.
Choose Funded Futures Network if…
- You want the cheaper way in ($178 vs $218).
- You don’t want a forced daily loss limit.
- You’d rather pay once than monthly.
- You trade on Quantower.
More comparisons
Other head-to-heads
TopstepVSApex Trader Funding
Topstep vs Apex Trader FundingCompare →TopstepVSTradeify
Topstep vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSTradeify
Apex Trader Funding vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSMyFundedFutures
Apex Trader Funding vs MyFundedFuturesCompare →TopstepVSTake Profit Trader
Topstep vs Take Profit TraderCompare →Lucid TradingVSTradeify
Lucid Trading vs TradeifyCompare →






