Purdia Capital6.5/10 3.7 (88)
VS
DayTraders7.9/10 4.5 (331)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Purdia Capital vs DayTraders

EOD Evaluation 50K vs EOD Evaluation 50K

9 rules compared
1Purdia Capital better
3Ties
5DayTraders better

DayTraders gets you funded for $199 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Purdia CapitalDayTraders
Cost to get funded
$309
$110
DayTraders $199 less
Evaluation price
$179 monthly
$105 one-time
Different billing
Activation fee
$130
$5
DayTraders $125 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
5
2 qualifying days
DayTraders fewer days
Profit split
Up to 90%
100% on simulated funded accounts
DayTraders keeps more
Restricted countries
No list
80
Not directly comparable
Our rating (out of 10)
6.5
7.9
DayTraders rated higher
Daily loss limit
$1,000
$1,250 (pauses trading until the next session; doesn’t fail the account)
Tie
Consistency rule
None
Best day ≤ 50% of profit (evaluation); ≤ 30% of each payout cycle (funded)
Purdia Capital is less restrictive
Payouts
After 10 funded trading days and the funded profit target; then daily on request
Every 8 qualifying days ($200+ days); $500 minimum, $2,000 maximum per request
Purdia Capital pays out faster
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate, TradingView
Rithmic (NinjaTrader, Quantower and others), ArcTrader
Purdia Capital supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Purdia Capital if…
6.5/10 3.7 (88)
  • You trade on NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate.
Choose DayTraders if…
7.9/10 4.5 (331)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($110 vs $309).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (100%).
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on Rithmic (NinjaTrader, Quantower and others), ArcTrader.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads