Phidias Prop Firm5.4/10 3.8 (271)
VS
Purdia Capital6.5/10 3.7 (88)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Phidias Prop Firm vs Purdia Capital

Fundamental 50K vs EOD Evaluation 50K

9 rules compared
4Phidias Prop Firm better
0Ties
5Purdia Capital better

Purdia Capital gets you funded for $271 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Phidias Prop FirmPurdia Capital
Cost to get funded
$580
$309
Purdia Capital $271 less
Evaluation price
$580 one-time
$179 monthly
Different billing
Activation fee
None
$130
Phidias Prop Firm $130 less
Profit target
$4,000 (8%)
$3,000 (6%)
Purdia Capital lower target
Maximum loss
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Phidias Prop Firm more room
Minimum trading days
3
5
Phidias Prop Firm fewer days
Profit split
80%
Up to 90%
Purdia Capital keeps more
Restricted countries
58
No list
Not directly comparable
Our rating (out of 10)
5.4
6.5
Purdia Capital rated higher
Daily loss limit
None stated
$1,000
Phidias Prop Firm has no forced limit
Consistency rule
30% rule on funded cash accounts
None
Purdia Capital is less restrictive
Payouts
Every 10 days once funded
After 10 funded trading days and the funded profit target; then daily on request
Purdia Capital pays out faster
Platforms
Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, DeepCharts
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate, TradingView
Phidias Prop Firm supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Phidias Prop Firm if…
5.4/10 3.8 (271)
  • You don’t want a forced daily loss limit.
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on DeepCharts.
Choose Purdia Capital if…
6.5/10 3.7 (88)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($309 vs $580).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads