Phidias Prop Firm5.4/10 3.8 (271)
VSFunded Futures Network6.6/10 3.8 (514)
Checked 3 Nov 2026
Phidias Prop Firm vs Funded Futures Network
Fundamental 50K vs MAX Standard 50K
11 rules compared
2Phidias Prop Firm better
4Ties
5Funded Futures Network better
Funded Futures Network gets you funded for $402 less.
Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.
Head to head
Phidias Prop FirmFunded Futures Network
Cost to get funded
$580
$178
Evaluation price
$580one-time
$178one-time
Activation fee
None
None
Profit target
$4,000 (8%)
$3,000 (6%)
Maximum loss
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Minimum trading days
3
5
Profit split
80%
80% sim funded · 90% live
Restricted countries
58
23
Our rating (out of 10)
5.4
6.6
Daily loss limit
None stated
None
Consistency rule
30% rule on funded cash accounts
Best day ≤ 40% of profit in early funded payouts
Payouts
Every 10 days once funded
Same day if requested in the payout window
Platforms
Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, DeepCharts
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower
Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.
Choose Phidias Prop Firm if…
- You trade on Rithmic, DeepCharts.
Choose Funded Futures Network if…
- You want the cheaper way in ($178 vs $580).
- You trade on Quantower.
More comparisons
Other head-to-heads
TopstepVSApex Trader Funding
Topstep vs Apex Trader FundingCompare →TopstepVSTradeify
Topstep vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSTradeify
Apex Trader Funding vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSMyFundedFutures
Apex Trader Funding vs MyFundedFuturesCompare →TopstepVSTake Profit Trader
Topstep vs Take Profit TraderCompare →Lucid TradingVSTradeify
Lucid Trading vs TradeifyCompare →






