MyFundedFutures8.8/10 4.9 (22K)
VS
BluSky8.2/10 4.7 (933)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

MyFundedFutures vs BluSky

Rapid 50K vs Launch 50K

10 rules compared
3MyFundedFutures better
6Ties
1BluSky better

BluSky gets you funded for $51 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
MyFundedFuturesBluSky
Cost to get funded
$209
$158
BluSky $51 less
Evaluation price
$209 one-time
$59 monthly
Different billing
Activation fee
None
$99
MyFundedFutures $99 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)EOD trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
2
2
Tie
Profit split
90%
90%
Tie
Restricted countries
88
92
MyFundedFutures fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.8
8.2
MyFundedFutures rated higher
Daily loss limit
None
None
Tie
Consistency rule
50% in evaluation, none when funded
55% in the evaluation (34% in the buffer)
Tie
Payouts
Daily; first one 24 hours after your first funded trade; $500 minimum
Daily, Monday to Friday, above the buffer
Different schedules
Platforms
Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, ATAS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
BluSky supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose MyFundedFutures if…
8.8/10 4.9 (22K)
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on ATAS.
Choose BluSky if…
8.2/10 4.7 (933)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($158 vs $209).
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on Rithmic, Sierra Chart, Bookmap.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads