Lucid Trading8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
VS
FundedNext Futures8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Lucid Trading vs FundedNext Futures

LucidFlex 50K vs Flex 50K

11 rules compared
1Lucid Trading better
3Ties
7FundedNext Futures better

FundedNext Futures gets you funded for $4.01 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Lucid TradingFundedNext Futures
Cost to get funded
$146
$141.99
FundedNext Futures $4.01 less
Evaluation price
$146one-time
$141.99one-time
FundedNext Futures $4.01 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$2,500 (5%)
FundedNext Futures lower target
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$1,500 (3%)End-of-day trailing
Lucid Trading more room
Minimum trading days
5 qualifying days per payout cycle
None
FundedNext Futures fewer days
Profit split
90%
95%
FundedNext Futures keeps more
Restricted countries
77
51
FundedNext Futures fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.0
8.4
FundedNext Futures rated higher
Daily loss limit
Optional, chosen at purchase ($1,200 if on)
None
Tie
Consistency rule
50% in evaluation
40% in the challenge only
Tie
Payouts
After 5 days of $150+ profit; up to 50% of profit, max $2,000 per request
First payout 5 days after funding, then on demand; 24-hour processing promised
Different schedules
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, ATAS, Rithmic
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView
Lucid Trading supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Lucid Trading if…
8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
  • You trade on Quantower, Sierra Chart, ATAS.
Choose FundedNext Futures if…
8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($141.99 vs $146).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (95%).
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads