Lucid Trading8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
VS
Bulenox8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Lucid Trading vs Bulenox

LucidFlex 50K vs Momentum Qualification 50K

11 rules compared
1Lucid Trading better
6Ties
4Bulenox better

Bulenox gets you funded for $3 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Lucid TradingBulenox
Cost to get funded
$146
$143
Bulenox $3 less
Evaluation price
$146one-time
$143one-time
Bulenox $3 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)Trailing (or EOD with a daily limit)
Tie
Minimum trading days
5 qualifying days per payout cycle
None
Bulenox fewer days
Profit split
90%
100% of the first $10,000, then 90%
Tie
Restricted countries
77
96
Lucid Trading fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.0
8.1
Bulenox rated higher
Daily loss limit
Optional, chosen at purchase ($1,200 if on)
None on the trailing option
Tie
Consistency rule
50% in evaluation
35% rule
Tie
Payouts
After 5 days of $150+ profit; up to 50% of profit, max $2,000 per request
After 5 profitable days of $150+ per cycle; $1,000 minimum
Different schedules
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, ATAS, Rithmic
Rithmic, NinjaTrader
Lucid Trading supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Lucid Trading if…
8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
  • You trade on Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower.
Choose Bulenox if…
8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($143 vs $146).
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads