Lucid Trading8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
VS
BluSky8.2/10 4.7 (933)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Lucid Trading vs BluSky

LucidFlex 50K vs Launch 50K

10 rules compared
3Lucid Trading better
5Ties
2BluSky better

Lucid Trading gets you funded for $12 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Lucid TradingBluSky
Cost to get funded
$146
$158
Lucid Trading $12 less
Evaluation price
$146 one-time
$59 monthly
Different billing
Activation fee
None
$99
Lucid Trading $99 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
5 qualifying days per payout cycle
2
BluSky fewer days
Profit split
90%
90%
Tie
Restricted countries
77
92
Lucid Trading fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.0
8.2
BluSky rated higher
Daily loss limit
Optional, chosen at purchase ($1,200 if on)
None
Tie
Consistency rule
50% in evaluation
55% in the evaluation (34% in the buffer)
Tie
Payouts
After 5 days of $150+ profit; up to 50% of profit, max $2,000 per request
Daily, Monday to Friday, above the buffer
Different schedules
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, ATAS, Rithmic
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
Tie

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Lucid Trading if…
8.0/10 4.4 (6.8K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($146 vs $158).
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on ATAS.
Choose BluSky if…
8.2/10 4.7 (933)
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on Bookmap.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads