FundedNext Futures8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
VSPhidias Prop Firm5.4/10 3.8 (271)
Checked 3 Nov 2026
FundedNext Futures vs Phidias Prop Firm
Flex 50K vs Fundamental 50K
11 rules compared
7FundedNext Futures better
3Ties
1Phidias Prop Firm better
FundedNext Futures gets you funded for $438.01 less.
Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.
Head to head
FundedNext FuturesPhidias Prop Firm
Cost to get funded
$141.99
$580
Evaluation price
$141.99one-time
$580one-time
Activation fee
None
None
Profit target
$2,500 (5%)
$4,000 (8%)
Maximum loss
$1,500 (3%)End-of-day trailing
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
Minimum trading days
None
3
Profit split
95%
80%
Restricted countries
51
58
Our rating (out of 10)
8.4
5.4
Daily loss limit
None
None stated
Consistency rule
40% in the challenge only
30% rule on funded cash accounts
Payouts
First payout 5 days after funding, then on demand; 24-hour processing promised
Every 10 days once funded
Platforms
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView
Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, DeepCharts
Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.
Choose FundedNext Futures if…
- You want the cheaper way in ($141.99 vs $580).
- You want to keep more of each payout (95%).
Choose Phidias Prop Firm if…
- You trade on Rithmic, DeepCharts.
More comparisons
Other head-to-heads
TopstepVSApex Trader Funding
Topstep vs Apex Trader FundingCompare →TopstepVSTradeify
Topstep vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSTradeify
Apex Trader Funding vs TradeifyCompare →Apex Trader FundingVSMyFundedFutures
Apex Trader Funding vs MyFundedFuturesCompare →TopstepVSTake Profit Trader
Topstep vs Take Profit TraderCompare →Lucid TradingVSTradeify
Lucid Trading vs TradeifyCompare →






