FundedNext Futures8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
VS
BluSky8.2/10 4.7 (933)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

FundedNext Futures vs BluSky

Flex 50K vs Launch 50K

10 rules compared
7FundedNext Futures better
2Ties
1BluSky better

FundedNext Futures gets you funded for $16.01 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
FundedNext FuturesBluSky
Cost to get funded
$141.99
$158
FundedNext Futures $16.01 less
Evaluation price
$141.99 one-time
$59 monthly
Different billing
Activation fee
None
$99
FundedNext Futures $99 less
Profit target
$2,500 (5%)
$3,000 (6%)
FundedNext Futures lower target
Maximum loss
$1,500 (3%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
BluSky more room
Minimum trading days
None
2
FundedNext Futures fewer days
Profit split
95%
90%
FundedNext Futures keeps more
Restricted countries
51
92
FundedNext Futures fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.4
8.2
FundedNext Futures rated higher
Daily loss limit
None
None
Tie
Consistency rule
40% in the challenge only
55% in the evaluation (34% in the buffer)
Tie
Payouts
First payout 5 days after funding, then on demand; 24-hour processing promised
Daily, Monday to Friday, above the buffer
Different schedules
Platforms
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
BluSky supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose FundedNext Futures if…
8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($141.99 vs $158).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (95%).
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
Choose BluSky if…
8.2/10 4.7 (933)
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads