Earn2Trade6.5/10 4.5 (5K)
VS
Funded Futures Network6.6/10 3.8 (514)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Earn2Trade vs Funded Futures Network

Gauntlet Mini 50K vs MAX Standard 50K

10 rules compared
1Earn2Trade better
4Ties
5Funded Futures Network better

Funded Futures Network gets you funded for $131 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Earn2TradeFunded Futures Network
Cost to get funded
$309
$178
Funded Futures Network $131 less
Evaluation price
$170 monthly
$178 one-time
Different billing
Activation fee
$139
None
Funded Futures Network $139 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
None
5
Earn2Trade fewer days
Profit split
80%
80% sim funded · 90% live
Tie
Restricted countries
25
23
Funded Futures Network fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
6.5
6.6
Funded Futures Network rated higher
Daily loss limit
$1,100
None
Funded Futures Network has no forced limit
Consistency rule
30% rule (evaluation and funded)
Best day ≤ 40% of profit in early funded payouts
Tie
Payouts
Monthly, paid through Rise
Same day if requested in the payout window
Funded Futures Network pays out faster
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower
Earn2Trade supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Earn2Trade if…
6.5/10 4.5 (5K)
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on Sierra Chart, Bookmap.
Choose Funded Futures Network if…
6.6/10 3.8 (514)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($178 vs $309).
  • You don’t want a forced daily loss limit.
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads