Earn2Trade6.5/10 4.5 (5K)
VS
Funded Futures Family8.2/10 4.5 (3.8K)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Earn2Trade vs Funded Futures Family

Gauntlet Mini 50K vs Prime 50K

11 rules compared
3Earn2Trade better
2Ties
6Funded Futures Family better

Funded Futures Family gets you funded for $105 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
Earn2TradeFunded Futures Family
Cost to get funded
$309
$204
Funded Futures Family $105 less
Evaluation price
$170monthly
$204monthly
Earn2Trade $34 less
Activation fee
$139
None
Funded Futures Family $139 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
None
1
Earn2Trade fewer days
Profit split
80%
90%
Funded Futures Family keeps more
Restricted countries
25
40
Earn2Trade fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
6.5
8.2
Funded Futures Family rated higher
Daily loss limit
$1,100
None
Funded Futures Family has no forced limit
Consistency rule
30% rule (evaluation and funded)
None in the evaluation; best day ≤ 40% of each payout cycle (funded)
Funded Futures Family is less restrictive
Payouts
Monthly, paid through Rise
Every 3 trading days; $500 profit needed since your last payout; up to $2,000 on the first payout, then $2,500
Funded Futures Family pays out faster
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
Tradovate, WealthCharts
Earn2Trade supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Earn2Trade if…
6.5/10 4.5 (5K)
  • You trade on NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower.
Choose Funded Futures Family if…
8.2/10 4.5 (3.8K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($204 vs $309).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
  • You don’t want a forced daily loss limit.
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads