Bulenox8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
VS
Phidias Prop Firm5.4/10 3.8 (271)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Bulenox vs Phidias Prop Firm

Momentum Qualification 50K vs Fundamental 50K

11 rules compared
6Bulenox better
3Ties
2Phidias Prop Firm better

Bulenox gets you funded for $437 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
BulenoxPhidias Prop Firm
Cost to get funded
$143
$580
Bulenox $437 less
Evaluation price
$143one-time
$580one-time
Bulenox $437 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$4,000 (8%)
Bulenox lower target
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)Trailing (or EOD with a daily limit)
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
Phidias Prop Firm more room
Minimum trading days
None
3
Bulenox fewer days
Profit split
100% of the first $10,000, then 90%
80%
Bulenox keeps more
Restricted countries
96
58
Phidias Prop Firm fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.1
5.4
Bulenox rated higher
Daily loss limit
None on the trailing option
None stated
Tie
Consistency rule
35% rule
30% rule on funded cash accounts
Tie
Payouts
After 5 profitable days of $150+ per cycle; $1,000 minimum
Every 10 days once funded
Different schedules
Platforms
Rithmic, NinjaTrader
Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, DeepCharts
Phidias Prop Firm supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Bulenox if…
8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($143 vs $580).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
Choose Phidias Prop Firm if…
5.4/10 3.8 (271)
  • You trade on Tradovate, TradingView, DeepCharts.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads