Bulenox8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
VS
FundedNext Futures8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Bulenox vs FundedNext Futures

Momentum Qualification 50K vs Flex 50K

11 rules compared
1Bulenox better
4Ties
6FundedNext Futures better

FundedNext Futures gets you funded for $1.01 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
BulenoxFundedNext Futures
Cost to get funded
$143
$141.99
FundedNext Futures $1.01 less
Evaluation price
$143one-time
$141.99one-time
FundedNext Futures $1.01 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$2,500 (5%)
FundedNext Futures lower target
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)Trailing (or EOD with a daily limit)
$1,500 (3%)End-of-day trailing
Bulenox more room
Minimum trading days
None
None
Tie
Profit split
100% of the first $10,000, then 90%
95%
FundedNext Futures keeps more
Restricted countries
96
51
FundedNext Futures fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.1
8.4
FundedNext Futures rated higher
Daily loss limit
None on the trailing option
None
Tie
Consistency rule
35% rule
40% in the challenge only
Tie
Payouts
After 5 profitable days of $150+ per cycle; $1,000 minimum
First payout 5 days after funding, then on demand; 24-hour processing promised
Different schedules
Platforms
Rithmic, NinjaTrader
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView
FundedNext Futures supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Bulenox if…
8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
  • You trade on Rithmic.
Choose FundedNext Futures if…
8.4/10 4.5 (82K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($141.99 vs $143).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (95%).
  • You trade on Tradovate, TradingView.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads