Bulenox8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
VS
Funded Futures Network6.6/10 3.8 (514)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

Bulenox vs Funded Futures Network

Momentum Qualification 50K vs MAX Standard 50K

11 rules compared
5Bulenox better
5Ties
1Funded Futures Network better

Bulenox gets you funded for $35 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
BulenoxFunded Futures Network
Cost to get funded
$143
$178
Bulenox $35 less
Evaluation price
$143one-time
$178one-time
Bulenox $35 less
Activation fee
None
None
Tie
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)Trailing (or EOD with a daily limit)
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
Tie
Minimum trading days
None
5
Bulenox fewer days
Profit split
100% of the first $10,000, then 90%
80% sim funded · 90% live
Bulenox keeps more
Restricted countries
96
23
Funded Futures Network fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.1
6.6
Bulenox rated higher
Daily loss limit
None on the trailing option
None
Tie
Consistency rule
35% rule
Best day ≤ 40% of profit in early funded payouts
Tie
Payouts
After 5 profitable days of $150+ per cycle; $1,000 minimum
Same day if requested in the payout window
Different schedules
Platforms
Rithmic, NinjaTrader
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower
Funded Futures Network supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose Bulenox if…
8.1/10 4.7 (1.8K)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($143 vs $178).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
  • You trade on Rithmic.
Choose Funded Futures Network if…
6.6/10 3.8 (514)
  • You trade on Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads