BluSky8.2/10 4.7 (933)
VS
Ylos Trading7.8/10 4.8 (882)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

BluSky vs Ylos Trading

Launch 50K vs Standard 50K

9 rules compared
2BluSky better
3Ties
4Ylos Trading better

BluSky gets you funded for $101 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
BluSkyYlos Trading
Cost to get funded
$158
$259
BluSky $101 less
Evaluation price
$59 monthly
$180 one-time
Different billing
Activation fee
$99
$79
Ylos Trading $20 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$3,000 (6%)
Tie
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
Ylos Trading more room
Minimum trading days
2
Not stated to pass; 10 trading days before a payout
Not stated
Profit split
90%
100% of your first $15,000, 90% up to $30,000, then 80%
Tie
Restricted countries
92
16
Ylos Trading fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.2
7.8
BluSky rated higher
Daily loss limit
None
None
Tie
Consistency rule
55% in the evaluation (34% in the buffer)
None in the evaluation; best day ≤ 40% of profit per payout (funded)
Ylos Trading is less restrictive
Payouts
Daily, Monday to Friday, above the buffer
After 10 trading days with 7 winning days ($50+); requests every 10 business days
BluSky pays out faster
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
BlackArrow
BluSky supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose BluSky if…
8.2/10 4.7 (933)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($158 vs $259).
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView.
Choose Ylos Trading if…
7.8/10 4.8 (882)
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on BlackArrow.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads