BluSky8.2/10 4.7 (933)
VS
Phidias Prop Firm5.4/10 3.8 (271)
Checked 3 Nov 2026

BluSky vs Phidias Prop Firm

Launch 50K vs Fundamental 50K

10 rules compared
5BluSky better
2Ties
3Phidias Prop Firm better

BluSky gets you funded for $422 less.

Neither firm is better for everyone. Start with the drawdown type and daily limit, because those decide whether your trading style survives the evaluation. Then compare cost and payouts. Both are futures firms, so the account sizes match.

Head to head
BluSkyPhidias Prop Firm
Cost to get funded
$158
$580
BluSky $422 less
Evaluation price
$59 monthly
$580 one-time
Different billing
Activation fee
$99
None
Phidias Prop Firm $99 less
Profit target
$3,000 (6%)
$4,000 (8%)
BluSky lower target
Maximum loss
$2,000 (4%)End-of-day trailing
$2,500 (5%)End-of-day trailing
Phidias Prop Firm more room
Minimum trading days
2
3
BluSky fewer days
Profit split
90%
80%
BluSky keeps more
Restricted countries
92
58
Phidias Prop Firm fewer restrictions
Our rating (out of 10)
8.2
5.4
BluSky rated higher
Daily loss limit
None
None stated
Tie
Consistency rule
55% in the evaluation (34% in the buffer)
30% rule on funded cash accounts
Tie
Payouts
Daily, Monday to Friday, above the buffer
Every 10 days once funded
BluSky pays out faster
Platforms
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap
Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, DeepCharts
BluSky supports more platforms

Green marks the better value on each row. List prices.

Choose BluSky if…
8.2/10 4.7 (933)
  • You want the cheaper way in ($158 vs $580).
  • You want to keep more of each payout (90%).
  • You expect to pass quickly and want a low first payment.
  • You trade on Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap.
Choose Phidias Prop Firm if…
5.4/10 3.8 (271)
  • You don’t want to pay an activation fee after passing.
  • You’d rather pay once than monthly.
  • You trade on DeepCharts.
More comparisons

Other head-to-heads